The research dating scores and the prestige of the magazines published found a higher education survey of almost 10,000 academics.

.

In addition to the personal interactions of an individual with another academic, the perceived quality of the magazine where a researcher publishes is the most influential factor by forming an opinion about his academic position, with almost half (49 percent) of 9,609 respondents who say it is so. Important and 12 percent that says it is more important.

asked about dating metrics, 24 percent say that index H of an academic and other similar measures are important, and 5 percent say they are the most crucial factor. P > If academics do you have to pay to attend awards ceremonies?

While personal interactions are more important (69 percent rate this as important and 41 percent more important) in matters of reputation, the popularity of the bibliometry may surprise some academics after sustained efforts to reduce the so -called prestigious economy in academic publication, which many blame the growing subscription and open access costs in the main magazines and marginalization of world class research published outside the renowned titles. >

Last month, more than 350 organizations from more than 40 countries signed a new pact, based on the 2015 Leiden Manifesto, which would see research mainly evaluated on qualitative measures and metrics based on abandoned magazine. This agreement occurred almost 10 years after the signing of the statement of the San Francisco investigation evaluation, which sought to eliminate the use of magazine based on the magazine by taking funds, appointment and promotion decisions, and which has now been signed for almost 20,000 people and 2,600 institutions worldwide.

According to the Times higher education survey, approximately half of the institutions (48 percent) used the quality of the magazine in which the investigation is published to judge whether a research collaboration had succeeded Or not, more than the proportion (37 percent) that said that the tangible impact of the investigation beyond the academy would be the criterion of success.

googetag.cmd.push (function () Googetag.display ("dfp-ad-fiicle_in_article");););););););););););););););););););

Mark Tweddle, Senior Higher Education Consultant on the Times Higher Education consulting team, said the researchers survey, of which 79 percent had at least 11 years of research experience, indicated the lasting influence of The main magazines and bibliometry within the Academy.

"With the growing change to open access publications in recent years, it could be assumed that deriving the reputation from where academic publication could decrease," Tweddle said.

"Maybe that will be the case in time, but for now it seems that the old habits die hard and there is a significant amount of congratulations to the academics who publish in certain magazines," he added.

related stories
  • views of the faculty in education, publication, technology
  • Academic magazines at Cross Fire Working, values ​​matter as much as the research experience, the survey also found. Being able to collaborate openly and with confidence was mentioned by almost a third of respondents (32 percent) as the most influential factor to begin a collaboration, while exactly the same proportion said that the alignment of experience in research is the most element crucial for collaborations.

    The reputation of individual investigation

    Image of How to find a teaching job in Universities in China
    Rate and Comment
    Image of  The Campus Child Care Crisis
    The Campus Child Care Crisis

    Emporia State University plans to close its child care center at the campus at the end of August, and parents are already stressed. The announcement

    Read more →

  • Login

     

    Register

     
    Already have an account? Login here
    loader

    contact us

     

    Add Job Alert