In April, the Legal Education Council of the American Association of the Bar Association, which accredits 196 law schools in the United States, proposed to eliminate a requirement that accredited schools use the admission test of the Law School or some standardized "valid and reliable" test equivalent in its admissions process. ABA's council clarified that law faculties "would remain free to demand a evidence if they wish."

If it is accepted, the proposal would be valid for the classes of the Law School based on the fall of 2023.

The LSAT is, with much, the most used evaluation for Admissions of the Law Faculty, and any aspiring lawyer can attest to the weight that a good LSAT score can have in the decision of a school. But as consensus accumulates for a reevaluation of the role of standardized evidence in other areas of higher education, the debate on its benefits has reached the admission of the Law School. The opinion is divided sharply and passionate on both sides.

more popular

Andrew Cornblatt, the dean of admissions in Georgetown the law, said that if ABA's proposal is approved to eliminate the standardized trial mandate, he has "all expectations" that Georgetown would become optional.

"As a general issue, the LSAT is useful, but it is not decisive for each applicant," he said. "I am excited about this. I think it is a real change in the way we have done things. " Opponents are concerned that eliminating a common standardized evaluation could make it difficult for law schools to ensure that applicants who may succeed, during their studies and then. The Admission Council of the Law Faculty, which designs and manages the LSAT, LSAT, He said that ABA's proposal is controversial because the LSAT is more predictive of success in school than other standardized tests, including the SAT, almost 10 percent more predictive, according to LSAC data. (This paragraph has been updated to correct the Name of the Admission Council of the Faculty of Law).

"I do not think we should experiment with the students. I think we should do what it works, and we know that the LSAT works, "he said. Desantis plan to control higher in the preferences and requirements of ed

  • the Ex students solve the demand with U of Wisconsin Milwaukee
  • The LSAT is also quite a precise predictor of whether a student will approve the bar exam after graduation, according to a 2019 study for the transparency of the faculty In law, a non -profit education defense organization. The study found that students who obtain scores in the mid -140s and below have a significantly greater risk of failing the bar than those with scores greater than 150.

    "The LSAT is at least some measure that says: 'Is: Is this applicant approves the bar?" Said Brian Tamanaha, a law professor at the University of Washington at St. Louis and Author of Failing Law Schools. "If we are going to take A A student's money, we have to believe that the student can successfully achieve her objectives. That will justify the economic investment they are doing. " push (function () Googetag.display ("dfp-ad-article_in_article_low"););

    aaron taylor, executive director of the Center of Accesslex for Excellent Legal Education

    Image of How to find a teaching job in Universities in China
    Rate and Comment
    Image of  Gen Z's Distrust in Higher Ed a 'Red Flag'
    Gen Z's Distrust in Higher Ed a 'Red Flag'

    The confidence in the colleges and universities of the United States. UU. For young adults, it must be won and not to give way, according to a recent

    Read more →




    Already have an account? Login here

    contact us


    Add Job Alert