Two new sets of documents of the Tiaa Institute emphasize the "volatility" of employment, benefits and financial security of the attachments, and how institutions should deliberately and creatively think better of them.

'those who have everything and those who do not'

the first study, led by Manuel S. González Cangché, Associate Professor of Higher Education at the University of Pennsylvania, finds that the 60 percent of the attachments employed in Multiple institutions have participated in a retirement plan, even if they are not currently contributing to it, compared to 46 percent of employees in an institution. Forty-five percent of attachments employed in Multiple institutions have health insurance provided by the employer, compared to 27 percent of employees in an institution. And 45 percent of the attachments that work in Multiple institutions are concerned about their ability to withdraw, compared to 36 percent of employees in an institution.

In a network analysis, the availability of the unions of the faculty was constantly linked to "bringing more security to these volatile academic caresses," the documents say.

more popular
  • How the Ph.D. The employment crisis is integrated into the system and what can be done about it (opinion)
  • online learning is not the future of higher education (opinion)

    Participants in the study expressed interest in the possibility of Having benefit plans that coincide with all institutions employees. The documents compare this idea of ​​"having or promulgating a centralized savings system", so that the attachments do not have to worry about changing the plans when they move from an institution or work on more than one.

    González CANCHÉ and the team of it interviewed 40 attachments of quotations of one year or less through a variety of types and places of institutions. Twenty-nine of 40 participants were employed in more than one institution. More than half of the sample had been working on colleges or universities for 10 years or more.

    A subset of the sample said that the attached teaching was not its main source of income, sometimes because they had a full time. I work outside the academy. The documents ask the institutions to think about this in the preparation of retirement plans for attachments, especially for those deputies that are "in real need".

    Faculty with attached appointments as their main source of income, while still unable to pay participation in retirement plans, even when at least one of its employers offers matching contributions, González Cangé and his Colleagues found. For these attachments, the summer months, what some call the "teaching season", is a fight. Many report that they have to save their teaching salary during the teaching months to deal with these months of Noaching.

    As these teachers "Clearly already have a mentality and attitude of savings," says reports, "Your need to save money for the short term excludes your participation in longer-term savings plans." A participant said, for example, that "there is a retirement plan of 6 percent available to me," but the complement could not afford to grant it due to a relatively low payment. googleg.cmd.push (function () googleg.display ("dfp-ad-article_in_article");); Do you want to announce? Click here

    Attached said that sometimes you see your appointments as "degrading due to differential treatment, such as the contributions of the lowest retirement account and salary compared to those available for full-time faculty," say the studies.

    These interviews were carried out before Covid-19. Studies say that the "repercussions of the pandemic have not yet been observed, and the design of plans to serve this subset of population is perhaps necessary not


    Image of How to find a teaching job in Universities in China
    Rate and Comment
    Image of

    Read more →

  • Login



    Already have an account? Login here

    contact us


    Add Job Alert