The Supreme Court of Monday dictated unanimously that the National Association of Athletics Collegiate can not prohibit modest payments to athletes.

The Court confirmed a ruling of 2019 by a judge of the Federal District Court, which in turn was approved by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit last year. Decisions refer to Sherman's law, which bars monopolly organizations in the United States.

As they often do, the judges took a measured approach. They chose not to take advantage of a potential opportunity to challenge the general regulations of the NCAA that limit the value of scholarships and other compensation linked to athletic performance, which could have undermined the entire business model of university athletics.

The most popular
  • Long-term impact of studying abroad for Japanese students | The world view
  • in rare protests of students, Juilliard students meet against increasing enrollment costs

    but a concurrent opinion of the associated justice Brett Kavanaugh suggested that such an account for the NCAA and its financial model is likely, And that at least he wants him anxiously. Then.

    The many rich traditions of university sports "can not justify the NCAA decision to build a massive collection of money collection on the back of the athletes of students who are not quite compensated," he wrote Kavanaugh "Nowhere, in the United States, companies can escape from the far away from not paying their workers a fair market rate on the theory that their product is defined by paying their workers a fair market rate. And under principles Ordinary of the antitrust law, it is not evident. Why university sports should be different. The NCAA is not above the law. "

    The Kavanaugh reasoning line may suggest where the court could be, but did not prevail on Monday. Instead, the associated justice Neil M. Gorsuch, who wrote for the Unanimous Court, focused on him in large part by strengthening the District Court's decision in 2019 and the decision of the ninth circuit last year.

    "Some will think that the district court did not go enough," Gorsuch wrote. "By allowing schools and universities to offer improved benefits related to education, their decision can promote scholastic achievement and allow athlete students to be a measure of compensation more consistent with the value they bring to their schools. Still, some will see This as a poor substitute for more complete relief.

    "At the same time," he added, "Others will think that the district court was too far by analyzing the social benefits associated with amateur athletics. For our part, however, we can only agree with the ninth circuit: 'The national debate on fan of college sports is important. But our task as appellate judges is not solving it. We could not. Our task is to simply review the sentence of the District Court through the appropriate lens of the Antitrust Law. "That revision persuades us, the District Court acted within the limits of the Law." googleg.cmd.push (function () googleg.display ("dfp-ad-article_in_article");); Do you want to announce? Click here

    The landscape for the compensation of athletes

    The ruling Monday of the Supreme Court represents the last step in a long-standing effort by university athletes to challenge what they believe They are unconstitutional (and immoral) restrictions to give players a largest part of a company that produces many billions of dollars for colleges, conferences, coaches and the NCAA.

    The case considered on Monday, the National Association of Athletics Collegiate v. Shayne Alston, differs from (but it is a relative A) the highly published demands on whether athletes should be compensated for the use of their name, image and similarity, a problem that is now playing in state legislatures and in the Congress potentially.

    The case of Alston flows from a class action challenge of 2014

    Image of How to find a teaching job in Universities in China
    Rate and Comment
    Image of Education Department Announces 161 Students to be Honored as 2022 U.S. Presidential Scholars
    Education Department Announces 161 Students to be Honored as 2022 U.S. Presidential Scholars

    Read more →

  • Login



    Already have an account? Login here

    contact us


    Add Job Alert